I have recently written a series of articles on the importance of macroeconomic data to traders. Macro data in its many forms can be considered big-picture information - think about an image taken from a satellite in space. We can see the outline and broad features of the object under observation (in this case the island of Sri Lanka) but at this resolution, we can’t see any granular detail without zooming in.
Macroeconomic data can tell us about the overall performance of an economy or sector within the economy. Still, it can’t tell us much more than that unless we drill down into that data.
Conversely, microdata, is data that looks at performance on a small scale, for example, that of individual companies or businesses. Can’t tell us anything about the overall economy when viewed in isolation. To find data that can shed light on a bigger scale we need to drill upward.
The large gap between macro and micro data has created two different approaches to analysis and investment: Top-Down and Bottom-Up.
Travelling up or down the financial data highway
Top-down and bottom-up are two different methods that analysts and investors use to analyse and value stocks.
A top-down approach to stock market analysis involves starting with the overall economy and then working down to individual industries and companies. Traders and Analysts who use this approach begin by analysing macroeconomic factors such as GDP growth, inflation, interest rates, and political developments.
They then focus on specific sectors and industries that are likely to benefit from these macro trends.
And finally, they evaluate individual companies within those sectors and industries.
In contrast, a bottom-up approach to stock market analysis starts with the individual company and then works up to the industry and the overall economy.
Analysts and traders who use this approach begin by evaluating the financial health and growth prospects of individual companies.
They then go on to consider the industry and sector within which the company operates, and finally, they assess the potential impact of macroeconomic factors on the company's performance.
One of the key differences between these two approaches is the level of emphasis placed on macroeconomic factors.
Top-down analysts believe that macroeconomic trends have a significant impact on stock prices and that it is essential to understand these trends to make informed investment decisions. They argue that by identifying the industries and companies that are best positioned to benefit from these trends, investors can generate superior returns.
Bottom-up analysts, on the other hand, believe that the financial health and growth prospects of individual companies, and sectors are more important than macroeconomic trends.
They argue that by identifying high-quality companies with strong financials and attractive growth prospects, traders can outperform the market over the long term, regardless of macroeconomic conditions.
History tells us that consistently outperforming the markets is a tough ask and one that’s beyond most traders particularly when we are talking about long-term time frames of a decade or more.
This is one of the reasons why passive or index-tracking investments such as ETFs have been growing in popularity.
Key differences
Another key difference between these two approaches is the level of emphasis placed on valuation. Top-down analysts typically focus on valuing industries and sectors, while bottom-up analysts focus on valuing individual companies.
Top-down analysts may use valuation metrics such as price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios or price-to-book (P/B) ratios to compare the valuations of different industries or sectors.
Bottom-up analysts, on the other hand, may use discounted cash flow (DCF) models or other valuation techniques to estimate the intrinsic value of individual companies.
As a result, these kinds of models and techniques, are often associated with value investors and traders, who look for underappreciated and mispriced assets, or, if you prefer stocks with hidden value.
So, which is better?
The answer depends on an individual’s investment or trading styles and time horizons.
Top-down analysis may be more suitable for investors who have a shorter time horizon and are focused on near-term market trends. This type of analysis suits big bigger picture instruments such as currencies, equity indices and bonds
Bottom-up analysis may be more suitable for investors who have a longer time horizon and are focused on the long-term prospects of individual companies. As such this type of analysis is suited to individual stocks industries and sectors, and the instruments that track them.
A hybrid approach
In practice, many analysts and traders use a combination of both top-down and bottom-up approaches.
For example, an analyst may use a top-down approach to identify the industries and companies that are likely to benefit from macroeconomic trends and then use a bottom-up approach to evaluate the financial health and growth prospects of individual companies within those industries.
In conclusion, top-down and bottom-up approaches are two different methods used to analyse and value stocks. Top-down analysis starts with the overall economy and works down to individual companies, while bottom-up analysis starts with individual companies and works up to the industry and sector level and then the overall economy.
The choice between these two approaches depends on the individual investor's investment style and time horizons. Ultimately, a combination of both approaches may be the most effective way to generate superior returns.
The information provided does not constitute investment research. The material has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is to be considered to be a marketing communication.
All information has been prepared by ActivTrades (“AT”). The information does not contain a record of AT’s prices, or an offer of or solicitation for a transaction in any financial instrument. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information.
Any material provided does not have regard to the specific investment objective and financial situation of any person who may receive it. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. AT provides an execution-only service. Consequently, any person acting on the information provided does so at their own risk.